The #1 Threat That Will Kill Most Course Platforms
And the JTBD | First-Principles Blueprint for Building a $1B Successor
Please Participate
I’m doing some innovation research and could use your help. In exchange, I will gladly give you 🚨 FREE access to my JTBD Masterclass 🚨and 6 other courses that come with it. It’ll take less than 10 minutes of your time.
This is completely anonymous unless you opt-in for the Masterclass
Click here to participate: https://web.jtbd.one/inno-survey
Introduction: The Quiet Extinction Event
Look around at the landscape of creator platforms today. What do you see?
On the surface, you see progress. You see an explosion of tools promising to help experts, coaches, and creators build businesses around their knowledge. Platforms boast about their new features: communities, email marketing, advanced quizzing, mobile apps. It feels like a golden age of empowerment, a vibrant ecosystem buzzing with innovation.
But if you look closer, you’ll start to see the cracks.
You’ll notice that for all the new features, the core experience on most of these platforms looks… identical. A list of video lessons on the left, a video player on the right. A sales page builder that spits out templates that all feel the same. A community feature that feels tacked-on, a shadow of a real social network.
This isn’t a golden age. It’s The Great Stagnation.
It’s a quiet extinction event, happening so slowly that most people don’t even notice. Most platforms today aren’t competing on innovation; they’re competing to be the best version of the wrong thing. They’re locked in a desperate arms race to add more features, sinking millions into a model that is fundamentally broken. This makes them fragile, commoditized, and deeply vulnerable to the systemic shocks that are already here, namely the rise of truly intelligent AI.
This isn’t a distant, hypothetical prediction. It’s an analysis of the breaking points you can see today if you know where to look.
The good news? This threat—this quiet killer—is also the single greatest opportunity for innovation in the creator economy we’ve seen in a decade. While the incumbents are busy rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic, a new category of platform can be built. A platform that isn’t just better, but entirely different.
In this deep-dive, I’m going to give you two things.
First, you’ll get a clear-eyed diagnosis of the threat. We’ll dissect the flawed assumptions that have trapped an entire industry in a feature-focused death spiral.
Second, you’ll get the blueprint. A detailed, actionable plan for building the next generation of creator platforms, rebuilt from the ground up on a foundation of solid, first principles. This isn’t just about escaping the threat; it’s about building a true, defensible, billion-dollar successor.
Let’s begin.
Part 1: The Great Stagnation - Diagnosing the Threat
The threat to modern creator platforms isn’t a single competitor. It’s not a market downturn. It’s a disease from within. It’s a profound lack of imagination, a strategic convergence that has turned a dynamic industry into a monoculture. And monocultures are brutally efficient until they face a shock they can’t adapt to.
The Race to the Feature Factory Floor
The core of the problem is this: most platforms have stopped innovating on the customer’s job to be done and are instead competing on features. They’ve become feature factories.
Every few months, a new feature is announced with great fanfare. “We’ve added circles!” “Now you can send email broadcasts!” “Check out our new certificate builder!” Each one is a small, incremental addition to a bloated, increasingly complex piece of software.
The strategic thinking behind this is simple and deeply flawed: “If we have more features than our competitors, we will win.” This leads to a checklist-driven development cycle where the goal is to match and exceed the feature set of everyone else in the market.
But here’s the truth: your customer doesn’t want more features. They want a better outcome. They don’t want a “community feature”; they want their students to feel connected and supported so they actually finish the course. They don’t want an “email marketing tool”; they want a reliable way to grow their audience and fill their programs.
By focusing on features, platforms are competing on the wrong battlefield. They are adding complexity, not value. And this has led to a direct assault on the core assumptions that once made their business models strong.
Assumption Under Attack #1: The Moat of “All-in-One”
For years, the holy grail for these platforms has been the “all-in-one” solution. The promise is seductive: “Everything you need to run your online course business, all in one place!” It sounds convenient, but the reality is a sprawling, mediocre experience.
An all-in-one platform’s email tool will never be as good as ConvertKit. Its community feature will never be as good as Circle or Discord. Its website builder will never be as good as Webflow.
By trying to be everything, these platforms become the master of nothing. The “all-in-one” moat is turning into an “all-in-one” liability. Why? Because best-in-class point solutions are now easier than ever to integrate. A savvy creator can stitch together a superior technology stack using specialized tools that are exceptional at their one job, creating a far better experience for both themselves and their students.
The platform’s weak, bundled features are no longer a convenience; they are a compromise. A compromise that a growing number of serious creators are no longer willing to make.
Assumption Under Attack #2: Content is King
The entire business model of a traditional course platform is predicated on one idea: that the creator’s content is the primary source of value. The platform exists to host and gate-keep this valuable content.
This assumption is being obliterated by generative AI.
When anyone can generate a high-quality draft of a course outline, a script, or a lesson plan in seconds, the value of the raw content itself plummets. Information is becoming a commodity. AI is not just a tool for creation; it’s a force for demonetizing pure information.
If your platform’s only real job is to be a fancy video player with a paywall, you are in a race to the bottom. Your value proposition is eroding with every new AI model that is released.
The future value isn’t in the content; it’s in the transformation the content enables. It’s in the unique perspective of the creator, the accountability of the community, the quality of the feedback, and the verified outcome for the student. A platform that merely hosts content is a library in a world where everyone has a super-librarian in their pocket.
Assumption Under Attack #3: The Direct-to-Consumer Promise
A key selling point for these platforms over marketplaces is the promise of a direct relationship with your audience. “Build your own brand,” they say. “You own the data.”
But how well do they actually deliver on this promise?
They give you a customizable landing page, but the design options are often rigid and uninspired, making it difficult to create a truly unique brand experience. They let you “own” your email list, but they provide poor tools for actually managing and nurturing that audience. They don’t provide the deep analytics and business insights needed to understand customer lifetime value, acquisition costs, or profit margins.
They haven’t given creators the tools to build a business; they’ve given them the tools to sell a product. There’s a massive difference. They’ve failed to graduate from being a simple e-commerce tool to a true business management system.
The Downward Spiral
When you combine these three crumbling assumptions, you see the inevitable endgame: a downward spiral of commoditization.
As AI makes content creation easier, more creators enter the market. As platforms all converge on the same features, they become interchangeable. With no meaningful differentiation, the only lever they have left to pull is price.
This triggers a price war. Platforms lower their monthly fees. Creators, facing more competition, lower their course prices. It becomes a brutal race to the bottom that erodes profit margins for everyone. In this scenario, the only winners are the consumers who get cheaper content, but even they lose in the long run as the quality of the educational experience declines.
This is the threat. It’s not a single event, but a slow, grinding process of value decay. To escape it, we can’t just add another feature. We need to tear the entire model down to its foundations and rebuild it on solid ground.
Part 2: First-Principles Deconstruction - Tearing Down to Bedrock
To build something truly new, you have to stop trying to improve the current model. You have to have the courage to ask the most fundamental questions, to challenge the very axioms the industry is built on. This is the process of first-principles deconstruction.
It’s not about criticizing; it’s about seeking truth. We’re going to strip away all the inherited assumptions about what a creator platform is and get down to the bedrock of what it must be to succeed in the next decade.
The Mandate: Stop Solving the Wrong Problem
The core mistake that has led to The Great Stagnation is that platforms have been solving the wrong problem. They’ve been trying to solve the problem of “How can we help a creator host and sell their content?”
That is a low-level, tactical problem. The real, high-level job is much deeper. To find it, we must deconstruct.
Deconstruction Phase
We’ll use a series of Socratic questions to challenge the most basic assumptions and separate them from fundamental truths.
Refuting Assumption: “The Job is to Create & Sell a Course.”
This is the most dangerous and pervasive assumption of all. It defines the entire scope of most platforms. But let’s question it.
Socratic Questions:
What is the creator’s ultimate goal? Is it just to make a sale?
What happens to the creator’s business after the sale is made? Is it stronger? More resilient?
If a creator sells 1,000 courses but their business fails a year later, has the platform done its job?
Is the “course” the only way a creator can package their expertise? What about coaching, workshops, communities, or physical products?
By asking these questions, the initial assumption falls apart. Selling a course is a means to an end, not the end itself.
Validated Truth: The creator’s job is to build a sustainable, scalable business around their expertise. The platform’s job is to be the operating system for that business.
Refuting Assumption: “The Platform is a Content Delivery System.”
This assumption dictates the entire product design: upload videos, organize them into a curriculum, and put a paywall in front.
Socratic Questions:
Can YouTube deliver content for free? Yes.
Can a creator deliver content in a private email newsletter or a PDF? Yes.
What, then, is the unique role the platform plays in the delivery process that justifies its cost?
What happens if a student consumes all the content but their life doesn’t change? Has the content been successfully “delivered”?
This line of questioning reveals that the delivery of information is a trivial part of the equation.
Validated Truth: The platform is a transformation delivery system. Its purpose is to structure knowledge, community, and accountability in a way that maximizes the probability of a student’s success.
Refuting Assumption: “The Student is a ‘User’ or ‘Customer’.”
This language seems harmless, but it frames the student as a passive consumer in a transaction. It leads to a focus on metrics like “enrollments” and “completion rate.”
Socratic Questions:
Why did the student really buy the course? What progress are they trying to make in their life?
What is the “after” state they are trying to achieve? Are they trying to get a new job, start a business, master a skill?
What is the true return on investment (ROI) they are seeking? Is it just the information, or is it a tangible outcome?
The student is not a user; they are an investor. They are investing their time, money, and hope into a future version of themselves.
Validated Truth: The student is a stakeholder investing in a personal or professional transformation. The platform must be designed to be a fiduciary of that investment, maximizing their chances of achieving a positive ROI.
Synthesis Phase: The Three Core Truths of a $1B Creator Platform
After tearing down the old, flawed assumptions, we are left with a simple, powerful, and unshakeable foundation. Any platform that wants to survive and thrive in the coming decade must be built on these three core truths:
Truth #1: It must be a Business Operating System. The platform is not a tool in the creator’s business; it is the central nervous system for the creator’s business. Its scope must extend beyond content to include marketing, finance, and operations.
Truth #2: It must be an Outcome Engine. The platform’s success must be measured not by content consumed or courses sold, but by student transformations achieved. The product itself must be an active participant in the student’s journey.
Truth #3: It must be a Moat Builder. The platform must provide tools that help the creator build their own unique, defensible assets—their brand, their community, their intellectual property—in a way that can’t be easily replicated on another platform.
This foundation doesn’t just describe a better course platform. It describes an entirely new category of company.
Part 3: The Blueprint - Rebuilding the $1B+ Successor
Armed with our first principles, we can now move from deconstruction to reconstruction. We can design the blueprint for a new type of platform that is immune to the threats of commoditization and AI.
Let’s call this new category the “Transformation-as-a-Service” (TaaS) Platform.
Its mission is not to sell information, but to enable and scale human transformation. It’s a fundamentally different business model built on the three truths we just uncovered. Here are the core pillars of its architecture.
Innovation Concept 1: The “Business OS” Dashboard (Profit Model & Business Model Innovation)
The first pillar redefines the platform’s relationship with the creator. It ceases to be a simple sales tool and becomes the command center for their entire business.
What it is: Imagine a central dashboard that looks less like a course manager and more like a CEO’s command center. It moves beyond vanity metrics like student enrollments and revenue. Instead, it surfaces the metrics that actually determine business health:
Customer Lifetime Value (LTV): How much is a student worth over their entire journey with the creator?
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC): How much does it cost to acquire a new student?
Profit Margins: What is the actual profitability of each product, cohort, or offering?
Sales Pipeline Velocity: How quickly are leads converting into paying customers? This dashboard would integrate marketing automation, sales analytics, and even financial services into one seamless view. It answers the creator’s real question: “How is my business really doing, and what lever should I pull next to grow?”
Working Today (in fragments): You see glimpses of this in other ecosystems. Substack, for example, is deeply focused on the business of writing, integrating payments, subscriptions, and analytics in a way that helps a writer think like a media entrepreneur. But no one has truly consolidated this for the knowledge creator.
Novel Concept (The Full Vision): The TaaS platform takes this a step further by becoming a financial partner. Based on the real-time business data flowing through the OS, it could offer integrated financial services. Imagine a platform that can offer a creator a cash advance to fund a marketing campaign, based on their predictable subscription revenue. Or a platform that provides integrated business banking, simplifying accounting and taxes. It stops being a software provider and becomes a growth partner, aligning its success directly with the creator’s financial success. This is a powerful Profit Model innovation.
Innovation Concept 2: The “Outcome Engine” (Process & Product Performance Innovation)
The second pillar fundamentally changes the student experience. It shifts the focus from passive content consumption to active skill acquisition and transformation.
What it is: The “Outcome Engine” redesigns the concept of a “course” into a guided “path.” This path is architected around achieving a specific, measurable outcome. Key features would include:
Project-Based Learning: Instead of just watching videos, students work on real-world projects that build a portfolio of verifiable skills.
Peer-to-Peer Accountability: The system actively creates small accountability groups, pairing students up to keep each other on track.
Structured Mentorship: The platform provides tools for the creator and their coaches to provide high-leverage feedback at critical points in the student’s journey.
Verifiable Certification: Upon completion, the student doesn’t just get a PDF certificate; they get a verifiable credential that showcases the projects they completed and the skills they demonstrated.
Working Today (in fragments): The cohort-based course (CBC) model, pioneered by platforms like Maven and Reforge, has proven the power of this approach for high-ticket programs. However, it’s still largely a manual, service-based model that is difficult to scale.
Novel Concept (The Full Vision): The TaaS platform productizes and scales the magic of the CBC model using AI. Imagine an AI Mentor that is an integral part of the learning experience. This isn’t just a chatbot. It’s an AI that:
Personalizes the Path: If a student is struggling with a specific concept, the AI can provide supplemental resources or alternative explanations in real-time.
Provides Instant Project Feedback: A student can submit a project draft and get instant, intelligent feedback on how to improve it, dramatically shortening the feedback loop.
Facilitates Connections: The AI can identify which students just mastered a concept and prompt them to help another student who is currently struggling with it, creating a dynamic, just-in-time peer mentorship network. This is a profound Process innovation that uses AI not to replace the creator, but to give them superpowers, allowing them to deliver personalized, transformative experiences at scale.
Innovation Concept 3: The “Integrated Commerce Stack” (Channel & Customer Engagement Innovation)
The third pillar breaks the creator out of the “one-to-many course” box and allows them to build a diversified, resilient business with multiple revenue streams.
What it is: This moves beyond a simple checkout page for a single product. It’s a unified commerce engine that allows a creator to design and sell a full portfolio of value offerings, all from one place. This could include:
Low-ticket digital products (eBooks, templates).
One-off paid workshops or live events.
Recurring revenue from a paid community or membership.
High-ticket coaching or consulting packages with integrated scheduling.
Even physical products or merchandise.
Working Today (in fragments): A savvy creator today has to stitch this together themselves. They use their course platform for courses, Calendly for coaching calls, Circle for their community, and Shopify for physical products. It’s a clunky, disjointed experience for both the creator and their customers.
Novel Concept (The Full Vision): The TaaS platform provides a single, elegant interface where a creator can build a “value ladder.” This is a visual tool that lets them map out a customer’s journey from a free lead magnet, to a low-cost introductory product, to a flagship course, to a premium coaching program. The platform then automates the marketing and upsell opportunities to guide customers along this path. A customer can have a single profile where they access everything they’ve ever purchased from the creator. This seamless Channel innovation makes it easy for a creator to increase their LTV and build a much more stable and diversified business.
Building a Moat with the 10 Types of Innovation
The true power of this blueprint comes from how these pillars combine to create a deep, defensible moat. Using a framework like the 10 Types of Innovation, we can see this isn’t just product innovation; it’s a holistic business model transformation.
A competitor might be able to copy one feature, but they can’t easily replicate the entire system.
You’re combining Profit Model innovation (the financial services in the Business OS) with...
Process innovation (the AI Mentor in the Outcome Engine) with...
Channel and Customer Engagement innovation (the Integrated Commerce Stack).
This creates a virtuous cycle. The better the business tools (Business OS), the more successful the creators become. The more successful the creators are, the more students they attract. The better the learning experience (Outcome Engine), the more transformations are achieved, leading to powerful testimonials and case studies. The easier it is to sell a variety of products (Commerce Stack), the higher the creator’s LTV, which allows them to invest more in growth.
This is a system that gets stronger with every user, creating a powerful network effect that is incredibly difficult for any competitor to overcome.
Reference Table for Novel Concepts
To objectively evaluate the power of these concepts, we can map them against a standard innovation matrix.
Conclusion: Build the Future, Don’t Replicate the Past
The Great Stagnation is real, and it poses an existential threat to the current generation of creator platforms. The relentless pursuit of more features has created a sea of sameness, leaving the entire industry vulnerable to commoditization and disruption. Continuing down this path is a recipe for irrelevance.
But the end of one era is always the beginning of another.
By returning to first principles, we’ve uncovered a new foundation. A foundation built not on the flimsy assumption of selling content, but on the bedrock truths of enabling business growth and human transformation.
The blueprint for the “Transformation-as-a-Service” platform is not just a collection of new features. It’s a new thesis for what a creator platform should be. It’s an integrated system designed to make creators more successful and their students more capable. It’s a platform that wins by ensuring its customers win, in the most tangible ways imaginable.
The future doesn’t look like another course platform. It looks like a true growth partner for the next generation of digital entrepreneurs.
For the founders, builders, and investors in this space, the choice is clear. You can join the feature factory floor and compete in a bloody race to the bottom. Or you can pick up this blueprint and start building the future.
I make content like this for a reason. It’s not just to predict the future; it’s to show you how to think about it from first principles. The concepts in this blueprint are hypotheses—powerful starting points. But in the real world, I work with my clients to de-risk this process, turning big ideas into capital-efficient investment decisions, every single time.
Follow me on 𝕏: https://x.com/mikeboysen
If you’re interested in inventing the future as opposed to fiddling around the edges, feel free to contact me. My availability is limited.
Mike Boysen - www.pjtbd.com
De-Risk Your Next Big Idea
Masterclass: Heavily Discounted $67
My Blog: https://jtbd.one
Book an appointment: https://pjtbd.com/book-mike
Join our community: https://pjtbd.com/join
This piece really made me think. It's like finding a new Pilates studio, only to discover all the classes are just slightly tweaked versions of the same old routine. True innovation require disrupting the core paradigm. You've articulated this stagnation perfectly.