What Job is Your Supply Chain Hired For? Rethinking Integration with JTBD

Discover How Focusing on Core Stakeholder Goals Transforms Your Integration Strategy and Reduces Complexity

May 05, 2025

Table of Contents

Supply chain integration. For many businesses, it feels like navigating a complex maze filled with dead ends, unexpected turns, and constant frustration. We grapple with siloed systems, data that doesn't communicate, slow response times when disruptions hit, and the sheer effort of managing countless tools, vendors, and processes. It's a persistent headache that drains resources and hampers growth.

The common reaction? We try to optimize. We invest in new software patches, tweak existing workflows, or chase the latest technological trend hoping for a silver bullet. But often, these efforts only yield incremental improvements, failing to address the fundamental challenges. We're essentially trying to find a faster horse when what we really need is a different mode of transport altogether.

What if there was a better way to think about integration? A way that moves beyond optimizing the current processes and instead focuses on the real reason integration matters in the first place? That's where the Jobs-to-be-Done (JTBD) framework comes in. It offers a powerful lens to uncover breakthrough opportunities by focusing on the underlying goals, or 'Jobs', your stakeholders are trying to achieve.

Reframing the Challenge: What Job is Your Supply Chain Really Trying to Get Done?

Jobs-to-be-Done flips the script. Instead of looking at what products or services people use, it asks why. What specific march toward success are they trying to make in a given situations? In the context of supply chain integration, who are the key stakeholders? Internal teams (procurement, logistics, manufacturing, sales), external partners (suppliers, distributors), and sometimes even end-customers. What are they fundamentally trying to achieve through integration?

Instead of just 'integrating systems', the core functional jobs might be:

Ensure reliable resource availability: Getting the right materials, components, or finished goods to the right place at the right time, consistently.
Minimize time-to-market for new products: Coordinating suppliers and internal processes effectively to launch products faster.
Adapt quickly to market demand shifts: Flexibly adjusting procurement, production, and distribution in response to changing customer needs or market conditions.
Prevent costly disruptions: Proactively identifying and mitigating risks across the supply network.

Notice how these job statements (using verbs like Ensure, Minimize, Adapt, Prevent) focus on the desired end state, not the intermediate processes. The specific context also matters – ensuring resource availability during a stable period is different from doing it during a major geopolitical disruption. JTBD demands we understand these nuances.

Uncovering Unmet Needs: Desired Outcomes in Supply Chain Integration

Once you understand the core Job(s), the next step is to define how stakeholders measure success. JTBD uses "Desired Outcome Statements" – precise, measurable, solution-agnostic metrics representing the stakeholder's definition of a 'job well done'.

For supply chain integration jobs like Ensure reliable resource availability, desired outcomes could include:

Minimize the time it takes to identify potential disruptions in the supply chain.
Increase the accuracy of demand forecasting communicated to suppliers.
Reduce the effort required to onboard a new supplier and integrate their data.
Maximize visibility into inventory levels across all partner locations in real-time.
Minimize the frequency of expedited shipping requests due to poor planning.
Increase the predictability of component delivery dates from Tier 1 suppliers.

Critically, the goal is to capture all relevant outcomes (ideally 75-150 for a complex job), not just the ones addressed by current solutions or those causing obvious pain today. Hidden unmet needs often represent the greatest opportunities for innovation.

Elevating the Abstraction: From Fragmented Processes to Holistic Solutions

Think about how many different tools, spreadsheets, emails, phone calls, and manual checks are involved in managing your supply chain today. You might have an ERP, a WMS, a TMS, supplier portals, BI tools pulling data (often imperfectly), and countless spreadsheets plugging the gaps. This is a low level of abstraction – stakeholders are forced to interact with and manually stitch together many fragmented pieces to get their underlying job done.

JTBD helps us see beyond this fragmentation. By focusing on the core job (e.g., Ensure reliable resource availability) and the key desired outcomes (minimize time to identify disruptions, increase forecast accuracy, etc.), we can ask: "What would a solution look like that achieves these outcomes directly, without forcing the user to wrestle with the underlying complexity?"

This is elevating the level of abstraction. Instead of simply connecting the existing messy tools, we envision solutions that inherently get the job done more effectively, hiding much of the operational complexity.

Imagine a single platform that doesn't just show you data from different systems, but actively monitors for patterns indicating potential disruptions, predicts the impact based on desired outcomes (like delivery time predictability), and recommends specific actions. The user interacts at a higher level, focused on strategic decisions, not manual data integration. This shift can fundamentally change who performs certain tasks and how they work, often simplifying roles and responsibilities.

Developing the New Strategy: Prioritizing Opportunities

With a comprehensive list of desired outcomes, how do you decide where to focus your integration strategy? JTBD, particularly when coupled with Outcome-Driven Innovation (ODI) principles, provides a quantitative method. You survey relevant stakeholders to rate each desired outcome on its importance and their current satisfaction with how well they can achieve it today.

This data reveals which outcomes are both highly important and poorly satisfied – these are the biggest unmet needs and the prime targets for innovation.

An integration strategy built on this foundation looks very different from traditional approaches:

It's customer-centric: Focused on solving real stakeholder problems (unmet outcomes).
It's data-driven: Prioritizes based on quantitative evidence of opportunity, not guesswork or competitor actions.
It's innovation-focused: Aims to create new value by addressing underserved outcomes, potentially leading to solutions that elevate the level of abstraction.

Case Study Snippet / Example

Consider "PharmaCo," a company struggling with coordinating logistics for temperature-sensitive drugs across multiple international cold-chain partners. Their traditional approach involved integrating tracking data from various shippers via APIs and manual checks – a complex, error-prone process (low abstraction).

Using JTBD, they identified the core job as Ensure consistent efficacy of delivered pharmaceuticals. Key unmet outcomes included minimizing the frequency of temperature excursions and reducing the effort required to verify end-to-end compliance.

Their new strategy didn't just focus on better data integration. They partnered to develop smart packaging with integrated sensors that monitored temperature and location autonomously, reporting exceptions directly to a central dashboard focused only on compliance and risk status. This elevated the abstraction – logistics managers no longer tracked individual shipments; they managed overall compliance risk, intervening only when necessary. The result was significantly reduced spoilage and lower compliance overhead.

Building a Resilient, Outcome-Driven Supply Chain

Stop tinkering with the pieces of your current integration puzzle. Start by understanding the fundamental Jobs your stakeholders are trying to get done and the outcomes they use to measure success.

Applying a Jobs-to-be-Done lens to your supply chain integration strategy allows you to:

Identify hidden opportunities for true innovation.
Develop a sustainable competitive advantage.
Dramatically reduce operational complexity by elevating the level of abstraction.
Build a more resilient and adaptive supply chain.

Focusing on the job and the outcomes isn't just a different approach; it's a more effective one. It aligns your resources with what truly matters to your stakeholders, paving the way for integration solutions that deliver real strategic value.

What's the biggest integration challenge you face in your supply chain? What 'job' are you really trying to get done when you think about integration? Share your thoughts in the comments below!

Enjoyed this deep dive? Subscribe for more insights on applying innovation methodologies to solve complex business challenges.

🚨🚨🚨 BONUS REPORT 🚨🚨🚨

Yes, you can dig even deeper! Check out this report and podcast for a more immersive exposure to supply chain integration

Autonomous Supply Chains 🤯

If you’d like to take action, I would love to help. Here’s are some steps you can take to make that a reality for us:

Join my community and get access to more content and tools
Apply for coaching so we can do projects together and build a new business-as-usual with someone who will share the knowledge, and hold you accountable. (I have limited seats so hurry!)
I do project work as well. Use the coaching link and we can discuss.

Why Me?

I’ve been trained by the best in Outcome-Driven Innovation. Part of that training involved how to understand what the future should look like. As a result, I’ve taken what I’ve learned and begun innovating so I can get you to the outcomes you’re seeking faster, better, and even more predictably. Anyone preaching innovation should be doing the same; regardless of how disruptive it’ll be.

How am I doing this?

I’ve developed a complete toolset that accelerates qualitative research to mere hours instead of the weeks or months it used to take. It’s been fine-tuned over the past 2+ years and it’s second-to-none (including to humans). That means we can have far more certainty that we’ve properly framed your research before you invest in a basket of road apples. They don’t taste good, even with whipped cream on top.
I’m also working on a completely new concept for prioritizing market dynamics that predict customer needs (and success) without requiring time-consuming and costly surveys with low quality participants. This is far more powerful and cost effective than the point-in-time surveys that I know you don’t want to do!

I believe that an innovation consultant should eat their own dog food. Therefore, we must always strive to:

Get more of the job done for our clients
Get the job done better for our clients
Get the job done faster for our clients
Get the job done with with fewer features for our clients
Get the job done in a completely different and novel way for our clients
Get the job done in a less costly manner for our clients

You could be an early tester of the latest developments, but at a minimum take advantage of an approach that is light years ahead of incumbent firms that are still pitching a 30 year old growth strategy process.

All the links you need are a few paragraphs up. Or set up some time to talk … that link is down below. 👇🏻

Mike Boysen - www.pjtbd.com
Why fail fast when you can succeed the first time?

📆 Book an appointment: https://pjtbd.com/book-mike

Update your small business tech stack: https://effectivecrm.ai/gohere